<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashdot Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign</link>
	<description>Some People Are Squirrel Handed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:56:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summit: The MakaluMedia Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gauging Reactions to the Slashdot Redesign</title>
		<link>http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>Summit: The MakaluMedia Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gauging Reactions to the Slashdot Redesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>[...] BorkWeb labels Alex&#8217;s brainchild &#8220;a pretty clean and snazzy design&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BorkWeb labels Alex&#8217;s brainchild &#8220;a pretty clean and snazzy design&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>All in all the new design is better than the current no matter which way you slice it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in all the new design is better than the current no matter which way you slice it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cause commander taco told them they couldn&#039;t do anything new ... he specified you had to use the same colors, the round sweep in the top left corner, had to use the same icons they&#039;ve been using for topics which had to have a white background, etc.  It was totally the wrong way to get a redesign.  He should have let people be innovative and see what came out rather than limiting them IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cause commander taco told them they couldn&#8217;t do anything new &#8230; he specified you had to use the same colors, the round sweep in the top left corner, had to use the same icons they&#8217;ve been using for topics which had to have a white background, etc.  It was totally the wrong way to get a redesign.  He should have let people be innovative and see what came out rather than limiting them IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wandering Pig Effer</title>
		<link>http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>Wandering Pig Effer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borkweb.com/story/slashdot-redesign#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm.  Looks very similar to the current crappy layout.  I see no snazziness here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm.  Looks very similar to the current crappy layout.  I see no snazziness here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

